Prediction of Valdemar Frederik Pape [] vs Jonathan Stenberg [] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
L L W L W L W W L L
Form
W L L W W L L L L LH2H: Pape 1 - 0 Stenberg
They have played 3 sets in total, with Pape winning 2 and Stenberg winning 1. The last match between Pape and Stenberg was at the M15 Vejle, 24-07-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Valdemar Frederik Pape getting the victory 2-6 6-3 10-5.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Valdemar Frederik Pape | 1 |
Jonathan Stenberg | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2-6 6-3 10-5 |
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
18 | Games Won | 14 |
0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Valdemar Frederik Pape vs Jonathan Stenberg Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Pape 1 - 0 Stenberg
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pape has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Stenberg has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pape, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Stenberg has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pape has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stenberg has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pape has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Stenberg winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pape has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6). Stenberg has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 26/ 22), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 37/ 47).
- Player level: In the last year, Pape has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Stenberg has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pape winning 1 times and Stenberg being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Pape winning 2 and Stenberg winning 1. The last match between Pape and Stenberg was at the M15 Vejle, 24-07-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Valdemar Frederik Pape getting the victory 2-6 6-3 10-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pape and Stenberg have played a deciding set 1 times, with Pape winning 1 times and Stenberg 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Pape winning 0, and Stenberg 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pape has played against opponents with an average rank of 462 while Stenberg has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pape has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stenberg has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pape has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stenberg has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Valdemar Frederik Pape Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Lucas Gerch
Player
Valdemar Frederik Pape
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Alec Deckers
Player
Valdemar Frederik Pape
42%
(
18 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Valdemar Frederik Pape
Player
Radovan Michalik
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
72
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Lewie Lane
Player
Valdemar Frederik Pape
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 3-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-6(5) 4-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 2-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Palaphoom Kovapitukted
Player
Valdemar Frederik Pape
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Elmer Moller
Player
Valdemar Frederik Pape
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Jonathan Stenberg Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Jera Staley
Player
Jonathan Stenberg
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Ivan Perez Martin
Player
Jonathan Stenberg
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Cedric Stanke
Player
Jonathan Stenberg
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
44%
(
17 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Milos Karol
Player
Jonathan Stenberg
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Johannus Monday
Player
Jonathan Stenberg
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jonathan Stenberg
Player
Axel Bergdahl
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Jonathan Stenberg
Player
Saba George Nanobashvili
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Olle Sonesson Lidholt
Player
Jonathan Stenberg
49%
(
36 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
34 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 7-5 10-8 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jonas Eriksson Ziverts
Player
Jonathan Stenberg
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
74 of
129)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
58 of
129)
117
Total Points Won
101
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Where To Watch Pape vs Stenberg?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Pape Vs Stenberg is now available here.

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
45% (5/6) | Win/Loss | 48% (64/70) |
44% (11/14) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (151/156) |
46% (112/130) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (1441/1467) |
0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
6 | Aces Total | 155 |
0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
19 | Total Double Faults | 144 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
42 | Average Opponent Rank | 68.13 |
61% (197/324) | 1st Serve % | 60% (1932/3240) |
56% (110/197) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (1251/1932) |
38% (48/127) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (570/1308) |
39% (9/23) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (133/307) |
37% (110/295) | Return Points Win % | 40% (1227/3032) |
45% (5/11) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (63/132) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (21/34) |
67% (2/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (18/42) |
100% (4/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (67/56) |
0% (4/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (67/11) |
14% (7/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (66/8) |
Other Predictions
- Loading news...